himynameisgian asked: Annoying as hell that I have to keep resourcing half the posts I find, only to have to end up linkin back here so people can finally get the idea. -_-'
minorsourceofmayhem asked: This blog kind of makes me want to go back in my blog and change every 'gofuckingnuts' source to this one. I don't follow him but he's probably the source for 1/3 the content on tumblr. what an asshole.
he started sourcing at some point but idk if he stopped, he just wants followers.
«—(yes, he did stop souring again…)
a-foundation asked: holograph, nepula, simpleflaw, and vqk don't source.
thanks ^^, but we
Never heard of those url’s, we don’t bother with that, if a picture is not sourced then we tag gfs to it.
wonderous-world asked: I always change the source to you guys lol. It annoys me so bad when people can upload a photo without properly crediting the owner and replace it with their own URL in hopes of gaining a few followers. How would they like it if that was their work >.> -sigh- rant over. I love you ok.
haha hell yeah keep it going! we have a strong team working at this!
myuniverseisyourstoo asked: Is it weird that I look at your blog to laugh at your arguments and at the gifs? You have funny gifs
not at all :)
whitefappel asked: You need to stop replacing photo credit with your URL. I credit every photo I upload, stop replacing it with your URL. Starting to really get annoying.
someones deleting your credit and its reaching our dashboards unsourced, not our fault, you can blame other people for that.
ellixt asked: you said how easy it was to find out the source of a photo using google images. why don't you do that instead of sourcing it to your blog? you're not helping at all. even if you source it to here, it's still incorrectly sourced.
Simple, cause i don’t want to, i have a life, this is a side bog it was made for fun, i had no intentions in actually blogging on this, i don’t want followers, all i wanted was the url, it’s self-explanatory, if my name is on a photo it means it’s not sourced, if you don’t like it, deal with it.
a-foundation asked: In the caption area of a picture I upload, I put (by >insert source here<). I don't link the source though. Does it still count as sourcing?
usually that gets deleted by most bloggers cause people tend to have a problem with leaving caption credit, thats why you leave the link in in the click through as well
b3autyl0ver asked: I need to talk to you. Most of the pictures on my blogs are my edits and the originals are wallpapers. how the fuck do I know the source? I put source to the ones I know, which I took from a photography site. So stop put your url in my pics. I took time to edit it, so I hope you respect my work as well. To remind you again, I did gave sources to the pics I know who the author is. You do it with good purposes, but take time to consider when it crosses the line.
Just cause you edited a picture to change the gradient of it, colors, ect. ect. doesn’t make it yours, if you wanna know the source to any picture simply go on google images, click on the camera button and upload the picture and the first source should be the owner of the picture. -GFS.
l3gendxry asked: lol you kids.
lol I’m 20.. I’m not the kid here.